Thursday, October 18, 2007

Reflection

Part 1

To be honest, the only reason I wrote these pieces was because they were assignments. My first piece that I chose to put on my blog was my Scarlet Letter essay. I chose this because I feel like I put the most time into it, and Mrs. Turner seemed to like it. I wrote about the flaws in the plot of The Scarlet Letter. My three main flaws I discussed were how Chillingworth's return was kind of overlooked and not well described, how there were many overly coincidental meetings between characters, and how Pearl acted much too mature for her age. The reason I chose this topic for this essay was because I was trying to find something I could write about to discuss how much I loathed reading The Scarlet Letter still being nice as to not get a zero. I thought about the reason I hated it, and I remembered thinking to myself about how disconnected the plot seemed, and the more I thought, the more it seemed like I had enough to construct an essay. The nature essay was pretty much just the result of an assignment. The point I tried to get across the reader was how Emerson and Thoreau had seen nature as a perfect place, and how different things are today.



Part 2

I considered revising my scarlet letter essay because Mrs. Turner had pointed out that some of the plot flaws I had discussed were based on untrue points. I decided they were close enough and still confusing to the reader, so therefore still flaws, and did not edit that part of my essay. Following Mrs. Turner's advice, I added sensory language to the beginning of my nature essay. I also added the first sentence to my second paragraph because Mrs. Turner had informed me that you couldn't start a paragraph with a quote. So, I added a sentence about Transcendentalists' beliefs before cutting to the quote of a Transcendentalist.



Part 3

I like how Hank quoted the bible in his scarlet letter essay, I felt like that made a powerful impact on the essay. hankse3blog.blogspot.com I also like Lewis Sheridan's sensory language in his nature essay. It makes you feel like you're really there. lewissheridan.blogspot.com Another essay in which I really liked the sensory language was David Watson's essay about his first time surfing. yodude3128.blogspot.com

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Emerson, Thoreau, and Nature

Many people in the class complained of the heat of the nature walk, but I welcomed it. I was just grateful to get out of the classroom. Transcendentalists believe in going to observe nature away from any traces of modern civilization. I didn't have this experience. While I thought the weather was fine, apparently unlike a majority of my classmates, there was an ROTC ropes course apparatus made of creaking wood and molding ropes in the middle of the woods which immediately took away any hint of a feeling of being alone with nature. Upon closer inspection of the woods, it was evident that this was not the only thing that was going to distract from the experience. Cars could be heard whizzing by, littering the ground were beer bottles and dip cans aplenty, glittering from the streams of sunlight breaking through the trees, and football equipment on the practice field was clearly visible. Surely Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and other past transcendentalists would not approve.
Transcendentalists have many beliefs and ideas about nature. Henry David Thoreau states "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if i could not learn what it had to teach..." While I may be interpreting this differently than Thoreau's original intentions for that line, I think there is something that can be learned from our trip to the woods. It was obvious that more needs to be done to beautify and preserve what true settings of nature are left in our world. Ralph Waldo Emerson makes a point similar to this, stressing the importance of the relationship between man and nature; "Yet it is certain that the power to produce this delight, does not reside in nature, but in man, or in a harmony of both." I believe Emerson is discussing something similar to just that; that man can only truly enjoy nature when he holds up his end of the bargain by keeping nature the way it was intended to be; unaffected by mankind.
The wonders of nature as described by Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson may be lost with their generation. As modern society advances and the human population grows, there will probably be even less and less woods and other areas of pure, unaffected nature for future generations to enjoy. Those who desire for the nature that Emerson and Thoreau seemed to have loved so much to be around longer will definitely want to make changes speedy and widespread in how the conservation of our world is viewed. I'm sure Emerson and Thoreau would immediately try to find a way to bring about change and make a difference. While our nature walk wasn't the beautiful, peaceful, natural experience that is was supposed to be, it was a good chance to see how nature is being affected by mankind and the changes that need to made soon.

Flaws In The Scarlet Letter

The Scarlet Letter is a very popular book, but one wonders how it achieved this status with such a plot full of loopholes. Many critics point these out, and it is amazing that the book is still a staple in modern literature with such a leaky plot. This is especially evident when Chillingworth returns; his return is very matter of fact with no real explanation. Hawthorne also fails to give good reason for the many times when characters meet each other at a perfectly coincidental moment. Another big problem is that of how Pearl, Hester's daughter from the adultery, seems very mature in her speech for her age.
The flaws in this book begin right at the beginning. Hester's husband returns from a mysterious two year disappearance that Hawthorne fails to elaborate on, which weakens the plot already and leaves the reader with a sense of cluelessness. Chillingworth conveniently doesn't tell anyone his name or who he is upon his return and finds his way to the crowd when Hester is up on the scaffold being ridiculed for her adultery. He just returned to find the wife that he hasn't seen in two years up on the town scaffold for adultery and manages to keep his cool, and not reveal his identity. This is a feat that many people could surely not pull off. He then creates his new name, Roger Chillingworth, and immediately is established as the town physician. This is how he was able to talk to Hester in her jail cell. Had the town not had a physician the previous two years when he was absent, or were they so desperate for one that they immediately hired an ugly man, in fact "one of this man's shoulders rose higher than the other." This is a small detail, but this was how Chillingworth was able to talk to Hester in the jail cell and convince her to not reveal to anyone his real identity, and how he was able to find Dimmesdale's secret. If it had been more realistic that wouldn't have been possible.
Chillingworth's arrival also exhibits another evident flaw. Many times throughout the novel, people arrived at places at just the right time. Many times it comes across as quite cheesy, and as if Hawthorne simply overlooked this fact in an attempt to follow his ideas for the book. How coincidental is it that Chillingworth arrives back after two years on the exact day that his wife is forced to stand upon the scaffold? Another time this is very obvious is when Dimmesdale exposes his inner guilt and his private torture by going to the scaffold during nighttime in the second scaffold scene. Hester and Pearl just so happened to be walking home when he was doing this. Even more unlikely is how Roger Chillingworth was there at the same time, hiding, waiting. This detracts from the power of the scene because Hawthorne doesn't give a sound reason as to where they were going or why they were there. This happens once more when Dimmesdale meets Hester in the forest. Again, there is no reason as to why either of them or there, and it is a great coincidence that they are there at the same time. This is a fatal flaw that consistently detracts from emotional scenes and causes scenes to come across as not being developed well enough.
Possibly the most popular problem with critics of Hawthorne's plot is that of the character of Pearl. This is first very obvious at the end of chapter six. Pearl is "big enough to run about," which is probably around the age of three. She says many things that are sophisticated beyond her years, such as "'He did not send me!' ... 'I have no Heavenly Father!' ... 'It is thou that must tell me!'" Pearl denies that her Heavenly Father is her father and wants to know who her real father is. This is not a very natural line of thought for a toddler. Hawthorne possibly does this to make her appear a young naive, immature child, but she comes across as more of a sacrilegious, almost creepy monster child. Another reason Hawthorne could possibly do this is to further explore the idea that Pearl is the spawn of the adultery, and a constant joy and torture to Hester. Hawthorne could be trying to make her seem abnormal, as if how she was created affected her behavior. An interesting idea, nonetheless, but it comes across as if Pearl is almost inhuman. This seems another case where Hawthorne ran out of creativity and cleverness, and pursued an idea without much thought as to what it was doing to the story. His tendency to do this definitely weakened the novel.
The Scarlet Letter is an interesting book with an initially creative plot. However, Hawthorne fails to strengthen it where it becomes shaky. The book almost has an incomplete feeling, as if it were almost a rough draft. He spends plenty of time elaborating on events less deserving than some of the major plot flaws with tedious descriptions. An area like this that greatly needed improvement is that of Chillingworth's return; it is very vague as if Hawthorne wanted to just get it out of the way. This goes hand in hand with another very obvious flaw. Many times Hawthorne couldn't seem to find a reason for people to meet up, so he just let it happen and assumed the reader wouldn't mind creating their own ideas as to why those characters coincidentally were in the same place. Another main problem is how Hawthorne makes Pearl seem very mature at very young ages. He could have easily let her grow older and her character would have fit better, but he chose not to. Overall, if the above problems were addressed more thoroughly, The Scarlet Letter would be a much better novel, and would attract a larger fan base.